Social Media Narcissism

When going through the process of adding / friending / following in social media, we often look for a common characteristic in our ‘friends’.  These characteristics can be anything, from the love of tech, design, political affiliation or religion or any other type of culture.  Why do we do this?  It’s an attempt in the perpetual battle of finding the the signal amongst the noise, but on that journey, are we falling prey to too much narcissism?

Here’s my concern:

If we only encourage interactions with people who are like ourselves by religion, politics, language, industry, etc., and shy away from everything else, will that not enclose us in a bubble?

Some Effects of the Bubble

One effect is that we end up with groupthink and an increasingly larger echo chamber.  A false reality is created by the purposeless regurgitation of ideas, everyone sheepishly agreeing with everyone else, and the ensuing lack of perspective due to isolation from the rest of the space.  Being open-minded isn’t enough.  What good is it being open-minded if there aren’t encounters with other perspectives?

Another effect is a related to the echo chamber: just pure boredom. Hearing about the same old topics over and over again can result in social media fatigue and blogger burnout.  Personally, I’d rather comment on someone else’s post rather than perpetuating a worn-out topic.  Sometimes, a comment can be just as meaningful as a post. (Heck, Disqus even thinks comments are blog posts)

Other effects include the suppression of different points of view which pushes folks to hold back on their level of engagement; and the isolation of those who dare to share all of the topics they like.

My Advice

  • Diversify your friend subscriptions
  • Encourage constructive discussion
  • Backup your opinions with facts
  • Empathize so you can be open-minded to see other viewpoints — you will learn more and appreciate others, and have others appreciate you for understanding them
  • Being open-minded also involves welcoming a variety of topics from unexpected sources
  • Be patient, you may have to endure some noise to gain more signal

In the end I think this will help you have more meaningful interactions, bring an added excitement to learning, and achieve greater satisfaction in your social media journey.

Is following a diverse group of people important to you?

No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)

Tags: community, conversation, echo chamber, Politics, Religion, Social Media

Related posts

  • August 26, 2008 at 12:52 pm Shey
    If we only encourage interactions with people who are like ourselves by religion, politics, language, industry, etc., and shy away from everything else, will that not enclose us in a bubble?
  • August 26, 2008 at 1:00 pm Cyndy
    Shey, this is an awesome post. Too bad the people who SHOULD read it probably won't.
  • August 26, 2008 at 1:18 pm Shey
    Thanks Cyndy :)
  • August 26, 2008 at 1:56 pm Shey
    Thanks Mel, like you I find the social phenomena of this space, fascinating. I really liked this comment by you: "Well, Freud argued that the one type of pathology that was totally untreatable was narcissism. The narcissist's ego is so powerful they are incapable of admitting fault or need for growth." This is a huge danger, IMO.
  • August 26, 2008 at 2:06 pm Marco(aureliusmaximus)
    Great post shey. It saddens me to think that as sites like FriendFeed become more popular the kind of gravitation towards one's "birds of a feather" will increase - on the other hand these tools allow us to identify and interact with individuals who place a premium on the same things we do (music, books, hobbies) which allows us to make those things a focal point while not completely eclipsing our ability to share our diverse thoughts in other areas as well.
  • August 26, 2008 at 2:06 pm Charlie Anzman
    Top shelf as usual pal :)
  • August 26, 2008 at 2:18 pm Shey
    Thanks Charlie :)
  • August 26, 2008 at 2:19 pm Shey
    @Marco That's a great point
  • August 26, 2008 at 2:27 pm Lindsey is Fierce!
    I personally friend people I find interesting. We may be alike in one area but differ in others. It's our differences that help us grow.
  • August 26, 2008 at 2:33 pm Jason Carreira
    Good post. I think part of the problem is a lot of people just seek to avoid confrontations and arguments, so they'd rather not see someone who disagrees with them. Personally I like to argue, so I don't have that problem ;)
  • August 26, 2008 at 2:50 pm Eric P
    I agree with Lindsey - my primary criteria is "interesting". Rarely does that mean "agrees with", because if all someone does is re-affirm my own point of view and tell me things I already knew... they're boring. I like to be challenged, and even if all I do is argue, then at least it forces me to defend my own ideas.
  • August 26, 2008 at 3:05 pm Robert Fischer
    The term you're looking for is "echo chamber".
  • August 26, 2008 at 6:10 pm Steven Cains
    Case in point; This post comes up 6 times on my friendfeed page via different people & services
  • August 26, 2008 at 6:11 pm Kyle Lacy
    Cains: It just means it was an excellent post. :)
  • August 26, 2008 at 6:29 pm Shey
    +1 Kyle! :P
  • August 26, 2008 at 7:52 pm Candace Holly
    I wanted to comment but it turned into a post so..I wrote it on my own space. http://candaceholly.com/2008/08/26/popping-the-bubble/
  • August 26, 2008 at 8:00 pm Louis Gray
    It is easier to be among peers who share your interests, and to ignore input from people who are different. I wrote about this in early 2006 (Blogging Bifurcation - A Web Divided) http://www.louisgray.com/live/2006/02/blogging-bifurcation-web-divided.html Good stuff, Shey.
  • August 26, 2008 at 8:12 pm Kamilah Gill
    I try to leave people I disagree with in until they get too abrasive. Then I have to block. It's not worth it to get annoyed online by some nearly anonymous nitwit. I get enough of that in real life, and in real life, of course, there's no block button.
  • August 26, 2008 at 8:15 pm Ruth Ferguson
    excellent suggestions Shey

Add New Comment on FriendFeed




  • KatFrench
    Your post makes me think of the musical concept of dissonance. A dissonant note doesn't fit--it's not in harmony--and yet it can add something to the composition.

    Life (and social media) without dissonance gets boring. :)
  • i've noticed is that it seems much easier to build up an audience of followers if you stick to one topic -- if that's your goal: to raise your profile. if you're blog is "all over the place" topically, then people don't know what to expect, it seems. it seems like the blogosphere doesn't suffer jack-of-all-interests bloggers very well. personally, i prefer to be all over the place, mostly because my blog is more like a notebook that I keep which just happens to be public, and i'm interested in many, many things. it all boils down to your goals for publishing a blog in the first place, i suppose.
  • "it seems like the blogosphere doesn't suffer jack-of-all-interests bloggers very well" -- I agree with this; but while I believe there should be a central focus, there has to be some wiggle room as well to spice things up.

    Your blog is one of a kind :)
  • Very interesting analogy, thanks for that :)
  • jpostman
    A great post, Shey, and a favorite topic of mine. I try to diversify my friends lists, and I have been very fortunate to get to know artists, writers, troublemakers, anarchists, environmentalists, and people in all kinds of professions (or not in any profession) all over the world. The whole social networking experience is so much more rewarding when we get outside the narrowness of our own familiar circles.
  • I think that's the way to go -- thanks Joel
  • Great post, Shey.

    I try to make sure I subscribe to a diverse set of individuals by interacting in a bunch of different places.

    One of the primary methods that gets me hooked up to people that may share interests slightly outside of my own is the FriendFeed Friend-of-a-Friend feature. I'm not sure people realize how powerful this is expanding your circle of "friends" and keeping things from becoming monotonous.

    To me, people that disable the FoaF feature are just sealing themselves into the echo chamber, blocking out all daylight.

    Services like Rejaw, Kwippy and I believe Plurk also give you the chance to interact with people outside of your primary circle.
  • FOAF is definitely a powerful feature in FriendFeed, one that we all could make use of more often.
  • Nice piece, Shey. :) Like you, I don't care about 'noise' and announcing how I'm going to 'clean up my list to filter noise'. I like diversity in my content and all about being positive and spreading positive vibes... After all, it's always easier to be negative than positive ;)

    Thanks for this write-up. You rock!
  • Thanks Mona :)
  • Nice post, Shey. I agree with what you've said and aside from hiding Digg and Stumbles, I read much is what is in my feed and learn a lot from people holding different views. It helps improve your own thinking and often times, one comes across a comment that makes one think differently rather than perpetuating the same old, same old.
  • Thanks Sally, learning from others is a great benefit of participating in social media.
  • i also like to diversify the content that i produce. when i first started blogging i kept my topic in the public relations/communications tunnel and I started to notice that echo chamber feeling. i made a decision to change the scope of my blog to include all of the fun (and not so fun) things in my life and because of that I've gained a whole new set of readers.

    great post shey!
  • I'm beginning to realize this as well as are other bloggers. I think many have gotten a little TOO focused on one topic.

    Even if I know my audience isn't going to love it, I'll still post anyway for variety's sake and because I also know at least a few people will benefit from it.

    Thanks Zoe!
  • I'm sure it was Steve's McCain supporter unsubscription post that inspired this. I had a very similar reaction to you and said so on the thread (David Knight). Steve remained subscribed to me and then later posted the following comment:

    "Interesting points of view all, I feel the need to clarify a bit. My initial post was a reaction to another thread where some of the commenters were actively anti-Obama. I only ended up un-following/friending 2 people, NOT exhaustively wiping anyone who mentioned McCain support from my entire digital life. I agree with all the comments here regarding the richness and vitality of discussion with those of differing viewpoints. That said, I feel that the US has been on deeply wrong track for too many years... - (steve isaacs)"

    Despite his choice of words to start with I think he was just dropping people engaging in political Trolling, a practice I follow no matter what party someone supports.
  • Actually, I saw it after I had written most of the post — but it re-affirmed that this trend has already been happening.
  • It is not uncommon for people to congregate in areas where their viewpoints are shared, and where they're likely to get positive feedback or see others like them. As sites and services grow, and filters increase, there is greater opportunity to reduce the influence from others, whether they be different than you by politics, race, religion, etc.

    In February of 2006, when nobody was paying attention to my blog (a simpler time), I wrote about this issue:

    Blogging Bifurcation - A Web Divided
    http://www.louisgray.com/live/2006/02/blogging-...

    Disagreement is healthy. Ignorance is unhealthy.
  • Participating in a diversified community increases the chances of, actually, finding, learning or communicating something new. Excellent post Shey even though with you latest seesmic engagement, I was afraid it was going to be a while before we see another post :)
  • Shelly
    Twitter is indeed fascinating. I'm watching a married guy I know, in his mid 40's, stalking a 23 year old. i can tell by the lame stupid things he posts he is trying to engage her. It's fascinating and disgusting at the same time. She has no clue and he is very manipulative and this stuff seems to work for him (obviously only for a short time, until the female realizes he's full of sh*t.) I know some of the little things he posts are outright lies. Fortunately she's got a lot of friends and a job she appears to love, so she's not desperate for attention.
    Twitter is ust another venue for narcissitic a*holes to inflict themselves on the rest of us. I'd never use it.
  • Well, I love differences. :D
  • Great post. I read something similar a few days ago, or maybe it was your post. I find that most people I interact with on Twitter and Friendfeed are pretty open minded and tolerant of others views. Unfortunately I have been blocked before simply because I said something in defense of Fox News and Bill O'Reilly.
  • Hey Shey,

    You are right on this point... I grow very tired of the same narrow minded view on many topics that seem to have evangelists for a specific point of view. People do follow these people like a herd and any new information or insight is either suppressed or met with hostility and ego.

    The best way to deal with closed loop communities, in my experience, has been to be controversial and inject your arguments in an undeniable way. The steps I take to make a mark in these types of communities is the subject of a future blog post for you (or me).

    I appreciate your insight.

    Charles Heflin
    Twitter @CharlesHeflin
  • It's the folks that don't subscribe to the fact that we don't all dance to the same tune that can make it so difficult to enjoy.

    I have tried to communicate my idea's on a subject without being abrasive ~ only to be attacked and even hunted down so they can try to discredit me in any way possible.

    This may be why many choose to stay inside 'the bubble'.

    Great post Shey!
  • Excellent point Shey and I'm actually doing just what you recommend. I heard you comment at WordCamp today. When I came home I searched Twitter for all posts related to #wcto08 and added anyone I didn't already follow. Sorry, make that EVERYONE I didn't already follow. Why? To broaden my horizons beyond the usual suspects and to possibly engage in some new conversations ... like this one!
  • That's a great outlook Mike,

    Thanks!
  • Nice post. I tend to be drawn toward diversity so the social narcissism hasn't been much of an issue.
  • Hi Shey... thanks for touching on this topic... my advice is to try and be extroverted and think of others. Today I wrote a very similar piece on social media "rockstars" vs. "narcissists" :

    http://socialmediarockstar.com/social-media-roc...
blog comments powered by Disqus